(my
comments & or predictions in green)
Proposal for Moving ASAC Forward
November 10, 2004
(original without
comments attached below)
In 1998, ‘Olelo’s Board of Directors recommended
the formation of the Access
Services Advisory Committee (ASAC). ASAC was created
(by the board)
to address producer and client concerns and was established to serve in
an advisory capacity to the Program Committee. Members of ASAC were
elected by their (client) peers and served in a volunteer capacity.
Since its initial formation six years ago ASAC members, Program
Committee members and staff have shown great commitment and interest in
making ASAC effective.
(In
reality, staff & Program Committee have done all in their power to
keep ASAC from being effective, including shutting it down for 9 months
in 2002
and for 11 months and counting in 2004. Many issues ASAC was addressing
have now been completed by staff in spite of ASAC suggestions and
recommendations.) Over time, however, the group gradually
shifted from advising on operational issues to board governance and
policy issues
(ASAC was working
on governance issues & procedures for itself
while still working on operational issues. The reality here is that the
staff and board did not want the committee to abide by "sunshine" law
or the board's bylaws, so to avoid being "fair, open and impartial"
board and staff are making ASAC even less effective.).
Recognizing the value of revisiting ASAC’s purpose and structure, at
the June 22, 2004 Board Meeting, the Board instructed staff to consider
‘Olelo’s current operational needs and make a recommendation on how to
move forward with ASAC.
(In
reality, per the June
22, 2004 Board Minutes: "Rochelle
asked staff to draft purpose statements for the Finance and Program
Committees to be presented at the next Board meeting. Rochelle also
asked staff to be prepared
to discuss the roles of Client Services, the Program Committee
and the
Access Services Advisory Committee." This "Proposal" was
prepared the day of the November 10 BOD
meeting without even ASAC members seeing it in advance of the BOD
meeting)
Staff recommends the following:
1. ASAC serve in an advisory capacity to staff, under
the direction
of the Chief Operations Officer
(of which there is none yet and they
say it will not be filled till possibly February. I predict it will be
a female with the name of Angela or Miki), and no longer
be
advisory to the
Program Committee.
(so now there
will be no board member present to hear the issues first hand, and if
staff decides not to take ASAC's "advice", only ASAC and the staff will
know. In other words the board will only know what 'Olelo wants them
to, keeping them deaf, dumb and blind monkeys.)
2. Staff revise the purpose of ASAC to specify the
types of issues
appropriate for the advisory committee.
(Total staff control of issues that
will be allowed).
3. Staff revise and document the operational
structure of ASAC to
specify how the group operates, including membership, frequency of
meetings and meeting and decision making methods.
('Olelo
will essentially trash all the prior work by ASAC on governance issues
and come up with, mark my word, more hoops to jump through and broad
restrictions designed to stifle Free Speech).
4. Current ASAC members’ terms continue in the
interim.
(keeping in the shills,
ex-employees
and staff wannabees to design a venue for client input)
Staff will consult ASAC on the development of the new ASAC structure.
(After 'Olelo drafts it and decides what can not be changed) Staff will
also seek input from the broader client base, as well.
(an
equal opportunity for all clients to have input? Don't hold your
breath! It will probably be done in a mediated forum with speech
restrictions).